News - NewMusic.News

Mk.gee Made a 33-Minute Debut With No Guests and No Clear Vocals

Almost every instinct in modern record-making pushes the vocal forward. Streaming rewards an identifiable hook early, playlists reward clarity, and a singer buried in the mix is normally a sign that something went wrong in mastering.

Michael Gordon, who records as Mk.gee, did the opposite deliberately, and it produced one of the most decorated debuts of its year.

Twelve Tracks, Thirty-Three Minutes, Nobody Else

Two Star & the Dream Police was released on 9 February 2024 through R&R. Twelve tracks, thirty-three minutes and eighteen seconds — an average of two minutes forty-six per song, with “New Low” at 2:06 and “DNM” at 1:58.

The more unusual number is zero. The album carries no guest features at all, which in contemporary alternative R&B is close to a statement. Debuts in this lane are normally where an artist spends their relationships.

Gordon had those relationships to spend. He played guitar on Dijon’s Absolutely, worked on Omar Apollo’s Apolonio, has a writing credit with The Kid Laroi, and was sampled on “Fair Trade” from Drake’s Certified Lover Boy. He used none of it. Dijon Duenas appears, but as co-producer on two tracks rather than as a voice.

The Vocal Is Under the Groove on Purpose

The signature is a mix decision. The Line of Best Fit, scoring the record 8 out of 10, describes vocals “layered under the minimalist groove” and intentionally mixed low, with “I Want” noted as “one of the few moments his vocals come through clearly”.

Burying the lead is only viable if something else is carrying the melodic argument, and here it is the guitar. The review characterises his tone as “warm but sharp” and used “as lyrically as his words” — which is the whole design in one phrase. The guitar is not accompanying the vocal; the two are sharing the job, and sometimes the guitar wins.

The rest of the palette is described as “dripping in reverb and sonically barebones”, with pounding toms, distant horns and twinkling synths, and a drum sound the reviewer places somewhere between Prince’s M1 and Meg White’s Ludwig snare. Reverb plus sparseness is a difficult combination: reverb usually fills a mix, and using it while keeping the arrangement bare means the space itself becomes an instrument.

The track listing itself points at the process. One song is called “Alesis”, after the audio-hardware maker whose drum machines and mixers furnished a generation of home studios. Naming a track for a piece of gear rather than a person or a feeling is a small tell about where the writing starts on this record.

Why Mixing It Himself Mattered

A buried vocal is exactly the decision an outside mixer talks an artist out of, and it is worth noting who held the fader. Gordon mixed the album himself.

That is the mechanism behind the whole aesthetic. A mix engineer’s professional instinct — and often their explicit brief — is intelligibility, so a deliberately obscured lead would be corrected somewhere between the first pass and the label playback. Keeping the mix in-house is what let a choice this counterintuitive survive to release.

Mastering was split, unusually, between two engineers: Heba Kadry took “How Many Miles” and “Candy”, Simon Lancelot the other ten. Splitting a short record between masters risks inconsistency, and doing it anyway suggests those two tracks needed something the rest did not.

It is also a deliberate break from his own past. The Line of Best Fit frames the album as a sonic departure from the lo-fi aesthetic of his earlier A Museum of Contradiction — so the reverb-soaked spareness here is a constructed decision, not a limitation carried over from making records cheaply.

Short Songs Are a Structural Choice, Not a Shortcut

Nine of the twelve tracks run under three minutes. That reads as brevity for the streaming era, but the record is not built like playlist bait — the songs are loosely structured and drift rather than resolving into choruses.

Short and unresolved is a harder combination than short and catchy. Without a hook to return to, a two-minute song has to justify itself on texture and feel alone, and it has to stop before the listener starts waiting for a payoff that is not coming. Ending early is how the record avoids reading as unfinished.

Only “Breakthespell” passes four minutes, at 4:27. It is the one place the album lets an idea run.

The writing is almost entirely his as well. Only two tracks carry co-writes — John Keuch and Sam Wilkes on “You Got It”, Keuch again on the closing “Dream Police” — so the same person is responsible for the song, the guitar part, the arrangement and the mix on ten of the twelve. That concentration is what makes a decision as unusual as the buried vocal internally consistent rather than eccentric: there is no seam where someone else would have argued for clarity.

The Critics Reached for the Same Word

Reception was strong and, more tellingly, consistent in what it identified. The album took a Metacritic score of 83. Pitchfork scored it 7.8, called it a “magnificent debut album” and noted that “nothing in contemporary music sounds quite like it”. The Guardian gave five stars, Rolling Stone four, Clash and The Line of Best Fit both 8 out of 10 — the latter praising “an artistry so well studied and expertly executed”.

Clash also described “an immersive quality” and a “nocturnal wash of acoustics”, which is a fair account of what a buried vocal and a wet, sparse mix do to a listener: you lean in, and leaning in is the point.

Year-end recognition went further than the review scores suggest. It was named album of the year by Clash, by Dazed, and by Jon Caramanica at The New York Times, and Pitchfork later included it among the best albums of the first half of the 2020s.

What the Charts Did and Did Not Say

Commercially it stayed in specialist territory: number eight on the UK independent albums chart, twelve in Scotland, ninety-one on the French rock and metal chart. There is no mainstream chart placing to report.

That gap between critical position and chart position is the honest outcome of the decisions above. A record with no features, no clear vocal hook and no song built to be excerpted has almost nothing for the mechanisms that produce chart placings to grab hold of.

What it has instead is a sound that critics repeatedly described as unlike anything else, which is the rarer currency and the one that survives a year-end list. For a writer curious about the opposite approach, our piece on how features became a career strategy covers what Gordon declined to do.

Two Star & the Dream Police is out on R&R.

By Will Lisil / August 28, 2026

Article Featured Music News Pop

Michael Kiwanuka Made Small Changes by Not Trying to Prove Anything

There is a particular problem that arrives after an album wins something. The next record has to answer it, and the usual answer is more: more production, more ideas, more evidence that the win was deserved.

Michael Kiwanuka went the other way, and was unusually explicit about why. “I wonder what an album will sound like when we’re not trying to be cool or anything, you know, we’re not trying to prove anything,” he told The Current. Small Changes is the record that came out of taking that question seriously.

What He Was Reacting Against Was His Own Record

Small Changes arrived on 22 November 2024 through Polydor and Interscope: eleven tracks, forty minutes and eighteen seconds, filed as psychedelic soul.

The album it is answering is Kiwanuka, which won the Mercury Prize, and his diagnosis of it is candid. “The production became, especially on Kiwanuka, like really, really relayed with so many ideas and so many sounds,” he said. He put both that record and 2016’s Love & Hate in the same category: “I definitely was in a different space of trying to prove a lot of things as an artist.”

Artists rarely say this about work that succeeded. Describing a prize-winning album as over-furnished is a real risk, and it only makes sense if the follow-up genuinely commits to the opposite. “I sort of went back to that, which was like, for me the right time,” he said. “Strip everything away and find out what it actually is.”

It is worth being precise about the record he is measuring himself against, because the modesty could read as false. Kiwanuka won the Mercury Prize. Following that with a quieter album is not the safe option dressed up as bravery — it is the option that forfeits the obvious way to capitalise on a win, which is to give the audience a larger version of what it just rewarded.

The Same Producers, a Different Instruction

The interesting decision is that he did not change the team. Danger Mouse and Inflo co-produced Small Changes, as they had Kiwanuka, and as Danger Mouse had Love & Hate before that — a third consecutive collaboration.

Changing your sound by keeping your producers is harder than changing your producers. It means the difference has to come from instruction rather than from personnel, and there is nobody new to blame if it does not land.

Kiwanuka’s account of what he learned is about restraint on his own side as much as theirs. “I’ve learned quite a few things that makes the process even a bit easier,” he said. “Just do what you do, which actually is easier for everyone.” On Danger Mouse specifically: “You can just ask any question, and you know you’re gonna get, like, a really interesting answer, or something you’ve never really considered.”

The writing credits show how deep the partnership runs. Every track is credited to Kiwanuka with Brian Burton and Dean Josiah Cover — Danger Mouse and Inflo’s given names — except the closer, “Four Long Years”, written by Kiwanuka and Burton alone.

What Understated Actually Means Here

His description of the goal is specific: “a lot more understated” than Kiwanuka, and “more about the voice, more about my voice, and more about the lyrics”.

That is a mixing brief as much as a writing one. Putting a voice forward is not a matter of turning it up; it requires everything else to stop competing for the same frequencies and the same attention. The eleven tracks are correspondingly compact — “Live For Your Love” at 2:29, “Lowdown (Part II)” at 2:40 — with only “Four Long Years” and “One and Only” pushing past four and a half minutes.

The two-part “Lowdown” is the tell. Splitting an idea into Part I and Part II rather than developing it across one longer track is a decision to let a thing be what it is and then stop, which is precisely the discipline he says he was after.

The rollout matched the thesis. “Floating Parade” appeared on 10 July 2024, the two-part “Lowdown” on 12 September, and “The Rest of Me” on 3 October — three months of singles that arrive and stop, rather than a campaign building toward a reveal. Nothing about the sequence asks the listener to wait for a bigger moment.

Jimmy Jam Is Playing the Organ, and That Is Not a Cameo

The personnel list contains a detail that is easy to skim past. Jimmy Jam — half of Jam & Lewis, one of the most decorated producers in American pop — appears on this record as a session organist.

Kiwanuka is blunt about the scale of it: “All the Hammond you hear, other than maybe one song, is Jimmy Jam. He’s on essentially a lot of the record.”

Engaging a producer of that stature to play rather than to produce is an unusual inversion, and it fits the record’s logic. A Hammond part is a texture decision, and having one player make all of them is how an album gets a consistent character without layering.

He is not the only heavyweight in a supporting role. Pino Palladino plays bass, James Gadson drums, James Payne slide guitar; Rosie Danvers arranged the strings with Pete Anthony conducting, and six named backing vocalists appear. Kiwanuka himself plays acoustic, electric and bass guitar, drums, piano and Wurlitzer, with Inflo on drums, piano, keyboards, Rhodes and synthesiser.

Kiwanuka also plays a great deal of the record himself, which is the other half of the same idea. When the person who wrote the song is the one playing the Wurlitzer part, the arrangement decisions and the writing decisions stop being separate stages that need reconciling.

The Reception Was Warmer Than the Modesty Suggests

Stripping back is usually the move that costs an artist their reviews. It did not here.

The album took a Metacritic score of 83. The Observer gave it five stars and called it “an exquisite return”; DIY and Uncut both went to four and a half; The Independent, Mojo and NME to four; Clash and The Line of Best Fit to 8 out of 10, the latter calling it “a beautifully crafted return”. Pitchfork was the coolest of the majors at 7.0, and AllMusic sat at three and a half.

Commercially it reached number two in the UK and number one in Scotland, with number two in the Netherlands, five in Flanders, six in Switzerland, eleven in Germany and fifteen in Austria. Those are not the numbers of a retreat.

Why the Experiment Worked

The reason a record made with “nothing to prove” did not simply sound smaller is that the restraint was applied to the arrangement and not to the ambition.

Everything expensive is still present — a legendary rhythm section, real strings, a full choir of backing vocals. What changed is that those elements take turns instead of stacking. That is a harder record to make than a dense one, because every part left in has to justify itself against the silence it is displacing.

It is the same instinct as a stable studio partnership: fewer new variables, more attention to each one. Our piece on why guitar bands went back to tracking live covers a related move, from a different direction.

Small Changes is out now.

By Will Lisil / August 28, 2026

Article Featured Hip-Hop Music News

Kae Tempest Sampled His Own Old Lyrics to Argue With Them

Sampling is normally an act of borrowing: you take someone else’s record and put it somewhere new. Kae Tempest does something odder on his fifth album. He samples himself, and not to quote a hook — to disagree.

Self Titled was released on 4 July 2025 through Island Records: twelve tracks, forty minutes and twenty-six seconds, produced by Fraser T. Smith with Tempest. The self-sampling is the structural idea the rest of the record is built around.

A Writer in Conversation With His Own Archive

On “Know Yourself”, old Tempest lyrics reappear inside the new song. The effect is not nostalgia and it is not a victory lap. Placing a line you wrote years ago next to what you would write today makes both of them arguable, and the listener hears the gap rather than being told about it.

Very few writers can attempt this, because it requires a back catalogue with enough definition that a fragment is recognisable out of context. Tempest has one: a career built on spoken word before it was built on records, where the words were always the fixed element and the music arrived around them.

It is also a risky device. Quoting your younger self invites the comparison you might lose. The record survives that because it is not claiming the older lines were wrong — only that they were written by someone with less information.

Tempest makes the relationship explicit in the lyric itself. Hot Press, which scored the album 9 out of 10, picks out the couplet on that track: “Now I sit among crates of rhyme books / And I thank the little me that put the work in.” That is gratitude rather than correction, and it reframes the whole device. The archive is not being interrogated; it is being credited.

The same track celebrates Wu-Tang’s influence on the teenage Tempest, which locates the self-sampling in a tradition rather than presenting it as a novelty. Hip-hop has always treated the crate as a working tool. Turning that instinct on your own back catalogue is a small extension of an old idea.

The Question He Set Himself

The NME review, which gave the album four out of five, quotes the brief Tempest set himself in an interview earlier that year: “What is it only I can say, that no other lyricist in the UK can say?”

That is a harder question than it sounds, and most writers quietly avoid it, because the honest answer is often “nothing yet”. Asking it out loud commits you to a record that cannot be assembled from craft alone.

What the album answers it with is specificity: an account of identity and medical transition told from inside rather than explained outward. The reviewer described the result as “a beefy, self-assured celebration of newfound identity”, which is a notably unburdened phrase for a subject usually handled as difficulty.

What Changed in the Voice Itself

There is a technical dimension here that has no real precedent in British rap. Tempest’s vocal tone has altered as a result of hormone treatment, which means the instrument delivering the words is physically not the one that delivered the earlier records.

That turns the self-sampling from a clever conceit into something closer to documentary. When an older line plays against a new one, the difference is audible in the timbre before it is audible in the argument. A device that could have been merely literary is doing acoustic work.

It also reframes what a “self-titled” album means five records into a career. The convention is that artists self-title a debut, or a reset. Doing it fifth, on a record about becoming legible to yourself, makes the title a statement rather than a default.

Fraser T. Smith and the Case for a Producer Who Pushes

Smith co-produced the album with Tempest, and the NME’s account has him pushing Tempest creatively rather than simply framing the vocal.

The evidence is in the range. “Statue in the Square” runs on trapped hi-hats, sirens and a menacing piano figure — the reviewer reached for NWA as a comparison — while “I Stand on the Line” opens the record closer to film score than to rap. “Hyperdistillation” turns to wealth inequality and social isolation. These are not adjacent settings, and holding them on one forty-minute record is a production problem before it is a writing one.

Tom Rowlands co-wrote “Know Yourself” and “Diagnoses”, the two tracks where the electronic architecture is most load-bearing.

Hot Press also credits Smith with encouraging two specific things: Tempest taking an active hand in the production, and writing in the first person. The second matters more than it sounds. A writer known for character work and third-person social observation moving to “I” is a structural change, and it is what makes the self-sampling legible — you cannot argue with your younger self from behind a persona.

A Guest List Chosen for Contrast

The features are unusually well spread. Young Fathers appear on “Breathe”, the album’s longest track at 5:53. Connie Constance sings on “Hyperdistillation”, Tawiah on “Bless the Bold Future”, and — least predictably — Neil Tennant of the Pet Shop Boys adds vocals to “Sunshine on Catford”.

Tennant is the interesting one. A south London street name in the title and a voice from forty years of British synth-pop in the mix is a deliberate collision of registers, and it signals that the record’s idea of its own lineage is broader than rap.

None of the four is a streaming-numbers feature. That is consistent with an album whose organising question was about singularity rather than reach. Our piece on how features became a career strategy covers the more common approach, which this record conspicuously declines.

The writing is quotable in a way that survives being lifted out. “Statue in the Square” carries “We’ve been there from the start and we ain’t going anywhere”; of “Bless the Bold Future” Tempest has said it “takes a maverick to stand in the crosshairs and say I won’t have it”. “Diagnoses” opens on a klaxon. None of these are subtle, and the record is not trying to be.

The Chart Split Says Who It Reached

The reception was broad and warm: a Metacritic score of 85, 7.9 at AnyDecentMusic?, four stars from The Guardian, The Independent and NME, 8 out of 10 from Clash and Uncut, four and a half from musicOMH and DIY, and 9 out of 10 from Hot Press. Uncut called it “often raw, venerable, painful stuff” with “moments of joy”, which is a fair description of a record that refuses to pick one mode.

Commercially it reached 25 on the UK albums chart and three in Scotland, while going to number one on the UK R&B albums chart. As with a lot of records made without a crossover strategy, the genre chart is the one describing what actually happened: a committed audience arriving deliberately.

Five albums in, that is the outcome a writer who asks what only he can say should expect, and probably the one he was asking for.

Self Titled is out now on Island Records.

By Will Lisil / August 28, 2026

Article Electronic Featured Music News

Nala Sinephro Scored an A24 Fight Film Without Once Sounding Like One

The safe way to score a film about a cage fighter is to make the music hit. Low brass, percussion that lands on the impact, a rising figure under the training montage. It works, everyone recognises it, and it tells the audience what to feel at the moment they are already feeling it.

Nala Sinephro did approximately none of that, and the result is the most interesting thing about a soundtrack that runs barely twenty-five minutes.

Her First Score, and She Did Every Job on It

The Smashing Machine soundtrack was released on 3 October 2025 through A24 Music and Warp Records, with a vinyl edition following on 23 January 2026. Eight tracks, 25:16.

It is her first film score, and the credits are unusual to the point of being the story. She composed it, arranged it, produced it, recorded it and mixed it. The per-track credits repeat the same line down the whole record: produced, composed and arranged by Nala Sinephro, mixed by Nala Sinephro. Heba Kadry mastered it; Isabel Gracefield, Jay Sylvian and Tom Coath engineered the sessions.

For a studio film that is close to anomalous. Scores at this level are normally a division of labour, with orchestrators, additional-music writers and a mixing team, precisely because the schedule does not permit one person to hold every stage. Retaining all of it means every decision is answerable to a single set of ears.

Why a Jazz Composer Got the Call

Benny Safdie, who wrote and directed the film, approached her after listening to Endlessness, her 2024 album for Warp. The film itself is a straight-faced biographical drama about the mixed martial artist Mark Kerr, with Dwayne Johnson in the lead and Emily Blunt alongside him.

The pairing looks like miscasting on paper. It is better understood as a director hiring for contrast rather than for fit. A composer whose existing work is patient, harmonically open and built on sustain is not going to produce fight-scene punctuation, and hiring her is therefore a decision about what the film is actually about — a body being used up, rather than a sequence of contests.

Twenty-Five Minutes Against a Fight Film

The critical response is unusually consistent on this point, which is worth noting because critics rarely agree on scores at all.

Pitchfork described it as “a disarmingly rich, romantic sweep of starlit strings and yearning synths”. IndieWire observed that it “works antithetically to the toughness of the images onscreen”. The Irish Times heard it humming “with quiet menace”. Rolling Stone, less admiringly, called it “a woozy jumble of alt-jazz”, and BrooklynVegan noted it carries “the same allure as Nala’s proper albums”.

Those are five different verdicts describing the same behaviour: the music is not doing what the picture is doing. Even the unimpressed review identifies the same quality, which is generally how you can tell a stylistic choice from an accident.

The running order supports the reading. The title track alone is 8:43, a third of the entire score, while five of the eight pieces come in under two minutes — “The High” at 1:15, “Dawn II” at 1:08. That is not the shape of a cue sheet tracking scene by scene. It is one long central piece with fragments around it.

The titles reinforce it. Two of the eight are returns rather than new pieces: “Dawn” opens the record at 2:15 and “Dawn II” closes it at 1:08, while “Mark” (1:44) is answered later by “Mark II” (1:30). Bookending a score with a shortened reprise of its first idea is a novelistic move rather than a cinematic one — it assumes the listener remembers the opening, which is only true if they are listening to the record rather than watching the film. Between those bookends sit “Grand Prix” at 4:02 and “KO” at 4:41, the two pieces with titles that promise action and, characteristically, do not deliver the expected kind.

What Was in the Room at Abbey Road

The score was recorded at Abbey Road Studios in London in 2025, and Sinephro’s own instrument list is synthesizers, harp, modular synths and harmonium — an unusual combination for a film about combat sport, and one that explains the texture. Harp and harmonium both sustain and decay slowly; modular synthesis is unpredictable by design. None of them is good at hitting a cut precisely, which is presumably the point.

She did not play it alone. James Mollison contributes saxophone, Nubya Garcia saxophone and flute, Morgan Simpson drums, Lyle Barton rhodes and synthesizers, Dwayne Kilvington synth bass, with strings from the Orchestrate ensemble.

Several of those names recur from her album work, which matters more than a credit list usually does. Bringing an existing band into a first film commission means the vocabulary is already established: nobody is learning how she works while the clock runs at studio rates.

The engineering credits are worth reading too. Isabel Gracefield, Jay Sylvian and Tom Coath share the recording work across the sessions, and Heba Kadry mastered the record. Mastering is the one stage Sinephro did not keep, which is the conventional choice even among artists who do everything else: a mastering engineer is valuable precisely because they have not heard the record five hundred times.

Endlessness Is the Record That Got Her the Job

Endlessness arrived on 6 September 2024 through Warp, ten tracks titled “Continuum 1” through “Continuum 10”, running 45:19. She composed, produced, arranged and engineered that one too, and also arranged and conducted its strings.

It was received as a significant record rather than a promising one: a Metacritic score of 83, 8.5 from Pitchfork, 9 out of 10 from both PopMatters and Clash, five stars from The Skinny. It reached number one on the UK jazz and blues albums chart and ten on the independent chart, placed fifth on Pitchfork’s albums of 2024 and tenth on Paste’s, and co-won Best Jazz Record at the 2025 Libera Awards.

The continuous-numbering conceit is the relevant detail for what followed. An album built as ten movements of one idea is already closer to score-writing than to song-writing, so the film commission is less a departure than an application of the same instinct to picture. Readers interested in that long-form instinct may find our piece on jazz and the long take a useful companion.

Her instrument list on that album was almost identical, and so was the band: James Mollison, Nubya Garcia, Morgan Simpson, Lyle Barton and Dwayne Kilvington all appear on both, with the Orchestrate ensemble on strings. The film commission did not require assembling anything new.

What Doing It All Yourself Actually Buys

The obvious cost of holding every role is time, and on a film that is the scarcest thing there is. The obvious risk is that nobody catches your blind spot.

What it buys is coherence under revision. Film music gets changed late and repeatedly, as edits shift and scenes move, and every handoff in that process is a chance for intent to leak. A composer who is also the mixer can respond to a re-cut without re-explaining the idea to anyone.

That is the likeliest reason a twenty-five-minute score by a first-time film composer holds together as an object you would listen to away from the film — which, on the evidence of the reviews, is exactly how people are treating it.

The Smashing Machine (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) is out on A24 Music and Warp Records.

By Will Lisil / August 28, 2026

Article Featured Music News Pop

Every Nilüfer Yanya Record Runs Through the Same Second Person

Most guitar-led songwriters accumulate collaborators the way they accumulate gear. A producer for the big single, someone else for the ballad, a mixer with a name, a co-write brought in when a chorus will not resolve. It is the default because it de-risks the record, and it is also why so many albums sound like several albums stapled together.

Nilüfer Yanya has spent three records doing the opposite. The credits keep returning to one other person, and the consequences are audible not in what the songs do but in what they decline to do.

The Second Person on Every Record

My Method Actor arrived on 13 September 2024 through Ninja Tune, eleven tracks, forty-four minutes, produced by Will Archer. Archer also records under the name Wilma Archer, which is why the same partnership appears under two names depending on where you read the credits, and it has been the constant across Yanya’s catalogue.

Her own description of the process is unusually blunt about its cost. She called it the most intense record she had made “in that respect. Because it’s only been us two.”

That is not a boast about purity. Two people in a room for a whole album means there is nobody to break a deadlock, no third opinion to defer to, and no way to attribute a bad decision elsewhere. It also means nobody arrives at track eight with a fresh idea about what the record should be. Both of those follow from the same choice.

The partnership predates this record. Yanya released Miss Universe in 2019 and Painless in 2022 before it, and the through-line across all three is less a sound than a way of deciding. Each album is recognisably by the same person without any of them repeating the last, which is the specific thing a stable collaboration buys: continuity of judgement rather than continuity of style.

What My Method Actor Cost Them

The album is about, in her framing, “entering a transition between one part of life into another”. That is a subject with an obvious trap: transition records tend to sprawl, because the writer is not yet sure which side they are writing from.

It does not sprawl. Eleven tracks, and the longest is five and a half minutes. “Keep on Dancing” opens at just over two minutes, and “Wingspan” closes at under two and a half. An album about not knowing where you are is not usually this disciplined about length, and the discipline is the tell: someone was in the room saying no.

Critics responded to it as a step up rather than a continuation. The album took a Metacritic score of 85 with an 8.1 at AnyDecentMusic?, Pitchfork gave it 8.5, and Under the Radar went to 9 out of 10 and later placed it second on its albums of the year. Pitchfork put it at 13, Exclaim! at 14.

What is notable is the breadth rather than the height of that response. The Line of Best Fit, Exclaim! and Clash all landed on 8 out of 10, while NME, AllMusic and MusicOMH each gave four stars. Publications with quite different tastes arrived at nearly the same verdict, which tends to happen when a record is doing one thing deliberately rather than several things hopefully. Uncut placed it 55th in its albums of the year.

The Independent Chart Tells the Truer Story

The commercial numbers are worth separating, because read carelessly they say the opposite of what happened. My Method Actor peaked at 53 on the UK albums chart. On the UK independent albums chart it went to number one.

Those two facts describe one audience. A record that tops the independent chart while sitting mid-table overall is being bought deliberately, by people who went looking for it, rather than picked up in passing. It also charted 11 in Scotland and 109 in Flanders.

For an artist working with one collaborator and no radio-shaped compromise, that is the outcome the method is designed to produce. It is not the outcome a label hoping for a crossover would have chosen, which is rather the point.

Dancing Shoes Is Where the Album’s Offcuts Went

The Dancing Shoes EP followed on 2 July 2025, again on Ninja Tune: four tracks, “Kneel”, “Where To Look”, “Cold Heart” and “Treason”.

Its origin is the interesting part. The EP was written alongside the album’s material and then set aside, and Yanya returned to it with Archer after touring My Method Actor. These are not B-sides in the old sense of weaker songs cleared out of a drawer. They are songs that did not fit a specific record and were given a second hearing by the same two people who rejected them the first time.

She has been direct about why one of them stalled. Of “Where To Look” she said: “We started writing this song for the album, but it was tricky to get it off the ground at that time.”

“At that time” is doing the work in that sentence. The song was not bad; the room was pointed elsewhere. A two-person partnership that persists across years can afford to shelve something and come back, because the people who understood the original intention are both still there. A rotating cast of collaborators cannot do that — the context leaves when they do.

The four tracks are short and none outstays its idea. That is consistent with the album it came from, where the longest song runs five and a half minutes and several stop well before three.

Why a Two-Person Room Sounds Different

The audible consequence is restraint, and restraint is the hardest thing to hear because it presents as absence.

Arrangements on both releases tend to withhold. Parts enter late or not at all. A song will sit on a figure rather than build the expected lift. That is very difficult to achieve with a large team, not because larger teams lack taste but because each new contributor arrives with something to add, and adding is how a contribution becomes visible. Nobody is thanked for the part they did not play.

Touring cuts the same way. Returning from the road with the songs still in muscle memory, and going back to the same collaborator, means the revision is informed by how the material actually behaved in front of people. That is a rare feedback loop; most records are finished before anyone has played them live. It is a close cousin of the argument for tracking a band together in one room rather than in isolation — see our piece on why guitar bands went back to tracking live.

What a Partnership Protects Against

The obvious risk of working this way is insularity: two people can talk each other into anything, and there is no outside ear to say a song has stopped working.

What it protects against is more valuable at this scale. An artist three albums in, with an independent-chart number one and no mainstream crossover, is exactly who gets advised to bring in a name producer and reach for a wider audience. That advice is easier to refuse when the alternative is not an empty room but a working method that has already produced a record placed second on a serious critics’ list.

The songs left off My Method Actor becoming Dancing Shoes a year later is the clearest evidence of the method’s value. Nothing was wasted, because nothing was handed to someone who did not know what it was for.

My Method Actor and the Dancing Shoes EP are both out on Ninja Tune.

By Will Lisil / August 28, 2026

Article Featured Hip-Hop Music News

Yaya Bey Built Fidelity Around Three Deaths and One Miami Hotel Room

Most records that get described as personal are personal in a vague way: a mood, a break-up, a season the writer will not name. Fidelity is personal in the way a witness statement is personal. Yaya Bey can tell you the room it started in.

The album arrived on 17 April 2026 through Drink Sum Wtr, sixteen tracks, and it exists because of what happened the week her previous one came out. In the album’s own notes, the Queens songwriter describes being on the road in a Miami hotel room, crying uncontrollably, while do it afraid collected the reviews she had wanted.

The Hotel Room Where the Record Started

What she identified in that room was not exhaustion, though she was exhausted. It was a structural problem with being a grieving person whose job is to be looked at.

“There was no place for that grief to exist that would not become a spectacle,” she has said of the moment. “I had been holding it in. Maybe, to protect myself. Maybe to prove the onlookers wrong. Whatever the case, it was spilling over now.”

That is a more specific complaint than burnout. An artist who writes about loss and is then received entirely through loss ends up in a loop: the more honestly the work lands, the more firmly the audience fixes them in the worst year of their life. do it afraid had been an attempt to move past grief as a subject. It was read as grief anyway.

The question she says followed was sharper than self-pity: “what part of that ache is specifically Black?” She went back into the studio after the summer, and Fidelity is what came out.

Three Deaths, and Why She Named Them

The record is organised around a framework Bey states outright rather than leaving for critics to infer. She calls them the Three Deaths: the personal, the communal, and the loss of innocence.

Naming your own structure is a risk. It invites the reader to check the work against the schema and find it wanting, and it forfeits the ambiguity most songwriters protect. It also does something useful: it stops the album being flattened into “sad record about her dad”, which is exactly the reduction that sent her to the studio.

The communal death is the one that will surprise anyone expecting a straightforward bereavement album. Bey uses it to chart the displacement of native New Yorkers and the fracture of the Black diaspora, from the gentrification of her native Queens and Brooklyn’s Bed-Stuy to what she calls the “diaspora wars” online. She is critical of the rise of Black capitalism, of an “individualism and tribalism” she sees replacing community solidarity.

The third, the death of innocence, is generational: a crash back to reality for people raised on the promises of the 1990s and Y2K, landing instead in pandemics, state violence and an industry she describes as exploiting and disposing of Black artists it once held in high esteem.

What Grand Daddy I.U. Left Her

The personal death is her father. Bey is the daughter of Grand Daddy I.U., the Juice Crew MC, who died in 2022.

That lineage matters to how this record sounds and not only to what it is about. She grew up adjacent to a canonical hip-hop institution, and the album’s willingness to move between rapping and singing reads less like genre tourism than like someone using both of the languages she was raised in. AllMusic files it as alternative rap alongside alternative and contemporary R&B, which is an unusually honest set of tags for a record that genuinely sits between them.

Bey turns the private loss into a question about the industry that surrounded him. She asks why the life expectancy of Black musicians is so short, why consequential artists receive their flowers too late, and why so many are left at the mid-career mark by a system that prefers the “shiny and new”. Her formulation is the sharpest line in the album’s notes: “Why are we more interesting as ghosts?”

Blue Is a Song She Wrote at Rock Bottom

“Blue” was the lead single and, she says, the first song written for the album. Her account of it is unusually specific about craft.

“I wrote it when I was rock bottom coming off the heels of do it afraid,” she has said. “When I realized I had to make a big shift mentally and emotionally or I was gonna drown. The production is really reminiscent of early 2000’s Pop/R&B like something red-haired Kelly Rowland would sing over on one of her solo projects. The nostalgia drew me to it. Almost like I’m coaching my younger self through something. Which I guess ultimately I am.”

That is a producer’s explanation as much as a songwriter’s. The choice of an early-2000s pop-R&B palette is not decoration; it is chosen because of who it addresses. The track sounds like the era she was young in, so the comfort is structural. It is a technique worth noting: using a period reference not for nostalgia’s own sake but as a way of speaking to a former self.

Forty Days, and the Arithmetic of Grieving

“Forty Days” carries the heaviest idea on the record and does it over disco-funk, which is the sort of pairing that fails far more often than it works.

Bey explains the title plainly. “There’s a belief that after a loved one dies you give them 40 days to pass over into the ancestral realm and that got me thinking about what is the time frame for the grieving to transition into a new life that is absent of the lost one’s physical presence. How do both acclimate to new conditions of the relationship?”

The song treats mourning as a process with a duration rather than a permanent condition, which is why the buoyancy is not a contradiction. Grief with an end date can be danced to.

The album’s features work the same way, arriving as encounters rather than as strategy. Fellow Queens native NESTA appears on “Egyptian Musk” after what Bey describes as a chance meeting: “I ran into NESTA at an event the night before and invited him to a session. We had this really dreamy reggae track that sounds like something old with a fresh spin. I named it Egyptian Musk ’cause it reminds me of the scent. Rich, sweet and comforting.” Deem Spencer, Exaktly, Samantha G. and Anastasia Antoinette also appear, a guest list assembled from proximity rather than from reach, which is the opposite of how features usually get used. Readers interested in that shift may want our piece on how features became a career strategy.

Fidelity as a Skill Rather Than a Feeling

The title is doing more work than it looks. Bey defines fidelity not as faithfulness to a person but as what she calls the ultimate Black skill: the ability to fall down and get back up, to be “religiously joyful” while the world is on fire.

Framed that way, the album is a deliberate turn away from mainstream accessibility and toward what she describes as a radical faithfulness to self and community. That is a commercially inconvenient position to take in public, and taking it in the album notes rather than in an interview means it cannot be walked back.

It also resolves the problem she started with. A record about grief that is organised as a set of arguments, with named structures and stated politics, is much harder to reduce to a sob story. She has made the spectacle difficult to perform. On the evidence of Fidelity, that was the point.

Fidelity is out now on Drink Sum Wtr.

By Will Lisil / August 28, 2026

Article Electronic Featured Music News

Ambiguous Desire Rebuilds Arlo Parks Around a New York Dancefloor

There is a particular kind of record an artist makes when the thing they were known for stops fitting. Arlo Parks built a career on proximity: songs that sounded like they were being said to one person, close enough to hear the breath. Ambiguous Desire, released on 3 April 2026 through Transgressive Records, is what happened when she stopped writing for a bedroom and started writing for a room with a soundsystem in it.

Twelve tracks, forty minutes and one second, and a set of credits that looks nothing like her first two albums. It is not a reinvention in the marketing sense, where an artist puts on a costume and calls it a chapter. It is more specific and more interesting than that: a songwriter working out what happens to her actual technique when the tempo doubles and the room gets louder.

What Changed Between My Soft Machine and This Record

My Soft Machine arrived in 2023 and stayed close to the template that made Collapsed in Sunbeams work. The vocal sat forward, the arrangements deferred to it, and the emotional register was confessional in the literal sense: someone telling you a thing they had not told many people.

Ambiguous Desire keeps the writing and moves everything underneath it. The first two singles set the terms early. Ticketmaster’s tour announcement noted that “Heaven” and “2SIDED” both lean into house music and UK garage, sounds Parks reached for after immersing herself in club culture. That is a real structural change, not a texture. House and garage put the vocal in a different relationship to the track: it stops being the thing everything else supports and becomes one element inside a groove that would keep going without it.

You can hear the consequence across the record. Phrases get shorter. Lines repeat where they would previously have developed. The writing has to survive being looped, which is a different discipline from writing something that only has to land once.

The Break-Up That Sent Her to the Club

The turn was personal before it was musical, and Parks has been unusually direct about the sequence. “I danced more than ever as I made this record, I made more friends than ever too, found myself in the weird underbelly of New York juke nights,” she said in the tour announcement.

That detail matters more than it looks. Dance records made by non-dance artists often fail because the writer treats the club as an aesthetic rather than a place they have actually stood in at three in the morning. Parks describes going repeatedly, socially, over a period long enough for it to change what she found interesting. The record reads as reportage from somewhere she had been, rather than a genre exercise assembled from references.

She has framed the album’s organising idea in the same plain terms: “This record has desire at its center. Desire is a life force, it’s a wanting, a yearning, a momentum.” Momentum is the operative word. It is a description of a feeling and a description of a rhythm section, and on this album those are the same claim.

Eight Producers, and Why That Is Not a Warning Sign

The credits list eight producers: Parks herself, alongside Paul Epworth, Rob Bisel, Andrew Sarlo, Buddy Ross, Romil Hemnani, Baird and Dylan Neustadter. On paper that is the shape of a record made by committee, the kind of album where a label throws names at a problem until something sticks.

It does not play that way, and the reason is in the rest of the credits. David Wrench mixed the album, and a single mixer across twelve tracks is what stops a multi-producer record from sounding like a compilation. Wrench is the continuity: whatever came in from whichever room, it leaves through one set of decisions about space and low end.

Epworth also appears as a musician rather than only a producer, credited with guitar, synthesiser, drums and bass, which suggests sessions where things were played rather than assembled. Simon Martinez plays guitar, Ryan Raines drums, and Brad Oberhofer piano. That is a band’s worth of human performance sitting underneath music that could easily have been programmed end to end.

How the Singles Mapped the Turn

The rollout was unusually long and unusually deliberate. “2Sided” came first on 13 January 2026, followed by “Heaven” on 2 February, “Get Go” on 10 March and “Beams” on 31 March, three days before the album. “Senses”, the Sampha collaboration, followed on 22 May, and a “Floette” remix with John Glacier arrived on 4 August.

Read in order, that sequence is an argument. The two most club-facing tracks went first, which is the opposite of the cautious approach, where an artist leads with the song closest to what audiences already expect. Parks led with the change. By the time the album arrived, anyone who had been paying attention had already decided how they felt about the new tempo.

The Sampha feature landing seven weeks after release is the other tell. A guest of that profile is normally spent on launch week. Holding it back suggests confidence that the record could open on its own terms.

What the Reviews Actually Split On

Critical response was warm without being unanimous, which is usually what an interesting record produces. Metacritic settled at 77 from a spread that ran from Hot Press at 9/10 and DIY at four and a half stars down to Paste at B-. Pitchfork landed at 7.1, Clash and Exclaim! both at 8/10, and The Independent and Rolling Stone UK at four stars.

The commercial picture was similarly split by category rather than by quality. The album reached number 13 on the UK albums chart, which is respectable rather than dominant, and number one on the UK independent albums chart, which is the number that actually describes its position. It also charted in Scotland at four, Germany at 43 and Switzerland at 50.

A number 13 peak alongside an independent number one is the signature of a record with a committed audience rather than a passive one, and that is the audience a tour of this length is built for.

The Desire Tour Puts the Record in the Room It Came From

The North American leg opens on 29 August at The Howard Theatre in Washington, D.C., then runs through Philadelphia, Boston, Montreal, Toronto, Detroit, Dallas, Austin, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Vancouver, Portland, Salt Lake City, Denver and Chicago, closing at Knockdown Center in Queens on 1 October. The UK and Ireland follow, with O2 Academy Brixton on 20 October, and Europe carries it to Stockholm on 2 December.

The venues are the point. These are mid-size rooms with proper soundsystems rather than seated theatres, and a record built on low end and repetition needs the former. Parks’ own framing of the tour was characteristically unfussy: “Let’s laugh, cry and move our bodies.”

What will be worth watching is the older material. A catalogue written for close listening has to survive a set built around a four-to-the-floor spine, and the usual solution is rearrangement rather than omission. It is the same problem, viewed from the other end, as the one this album set itself: how a voice trained for intimacy holds its shape at volume. Readers curious about how that voice gets constructed in the first place may find our piece on how a pop vocal actually gets built a useful companion.

Ambiguous Desire is out now on Transgressive Records. The Desire Tour runs from 29 August to 2 December.

By Will Lisil / August 28, 2026

Article Featured Music News Pop

Rachel Chinouriri’s Second Album Is One Night Out, Five Years Long

Rachel Chinouriri, photographed for the announcement of her second album I think I spoke too soon

Three place names sit on the credits of Rachel Chinouriri’s second album, and one of them does not belong with the others. London and Los Angeles are where British pop records get written. Hereford is not, and part of I think I spoke too soon was made there anyway.

That is the kind of detail that only reads as a decision in hindsight. The record arrives on 16 October through Parlophone and Atlas Artists, and its architecture is stranger than a release note makes it sound. Chinouriri did not write a set of songs about her twenties. She wrote one night out, and put five years inside it.

A Night Out That Took Five Years to Write

The governing idea of the album, as Chinouriri has described it, is that the whole thing lasts one evening. Her formative years are compressed into a single night, with every version of herself from that stretch sharing the same floor at the same time. The span she documents runs from twenty-two to twenty-seven, which in her case takes in the writing and release of a debut album and everything that followed it.

It is a structural choice before it is a thematic one, and it does a job that a chronological record cannot. A night out has a shape: the arrival, the stretch where everything is working, the hour where the room tips, the decision about when to leave. Threading half a decade through that shape gives a writer somewhere to put material that would otherwise sit as separate songs about separate years, each one arriving with its own explanation. Here the explanation is the setting.

Chinouriri has said the record takes in her sobriety, the transformation of her inner and outer worlds, femininity and relationships, and that the idea underneath all of it works as a kind of permission slip: that a person can change who they are at any moment, and forgive themselves at any moment. Forgiveness, in her framing, is the step that comes first. Everything else follows from it.

Why the Same Four Names Kept Coming Back

Four of the people on the credits are described as longtime collaborators: APOB, Mary Weitz, Glen Roberts and Daniel Hylton-Nuamah. On a major-label second album, that much continuity is worth noticing. The usual pressure after a debut that performs is to widen the room: to bring in writers with recent hits attached, to book sessions with people whose names do useful work on a credit sheet.

Keeping a settled writing room does something different. It removes the first two days of every session, the part where everybody establishes what the artist will and will not do, and it means a bad idea can be called a bad idea without anyone losing face. Records made this way tend to sound less negotiated. Whether that is what happened here is something the album will answer in October, but the personnel decision was made long before the release date was.

The Two New Voices in the Room

Two names are credited as new: Lucy Dacus and Eli Teplin. Adding a small number of outside writers to an established group is a narrower move than reopening the room entirely, and it is a common way to keep a second album from repeating the first without dismantling what made the first work.

It also changes the arithmetic of a session. A settled team knows the artist’s instincts well enough to protect them; a new writer has no reason to protect anything and will suggest the thing nobody in the room would have said out loud. Two of those against four people who know the catalogue is a deliberate ratio, not an accident of scheduling.

Three Cities on One Set of Credits

The writing and recording happened in London, Hereford and Los Angeles. Two of those are obvious. London is home and the industry’s centre of gravity; Los Angeles is where a British artist with an American touring calendar ends up spending session time whether or not that was the plan.

Hereford is the one that has to be chosen. Nobody drifts into recording there between other commitments, which makes it the closest thing on the credits to a stated intention: a stretch of work done somewhere with no industry to walk into afterwards and nobody dropping by. For an album built around the small hours and what a person admits to themselves in them, a location with nothing else going on is not a neutral detail. Read across all three, the geography of Rachel Chinouriri’s second album looks less like a schedule and more like a sequence of deliberate rooms.

The Single That Sits on the Edge of Leaving

The first song released from the album is “One song away from crying,” a synth-pop track with a video directed by Dora Paphides. It sets its scene on a dancefloor at the exact point where a good night stops being one.

“‘One song away from crying’ is about the precipice of a night out where you know you need to leave and have to make a decision,” Chinouriri said in the announcement. She has added that underneath the scene sits a deeper conflict with self-worth that has not yet been looked at directly.

As a lead single it is doing double duty. It works on its own terms, and it also explains the structure of the album in advance: this is a record that lives at the hour when the room is still full and one person in it has already decided to go home.

What Changed Since the Debut

Chinouriri’s first album, What a Devastating Turn of Events, came out in 2024 on Parlophone and reached the top twenty of the UK Official Charts. It brought two BRIT Award nominations, for Artist of the Year and Best New Artist, and it followed a run of releases that had already earned her an Ivor Novello nomination: the 2021 project Four° in Winter and the 2022 EP Better Off Without. An EP, Little House, came after the album.

That sequence matters to how the second record reads. This is not a debut written in private and released into silence, and it is not a rushed follow-up either. It is the album made by someone who has now watched her own songs travel, played them to rooms of people who already knew them, and had to decide what to do with the version of herself that existed before any of that happened. Putting that person on the same dancefloor as the current one is a fairly direct answer.

The Road to 16 October

The touring run around the record opened at the El Rey in Los Angeles on 26 August, with September dates in Dublin, London, Brussels, Paris, Amsterdam and Berlin before the album itself lands. Playing an album’s worth of unreleased material to rooms that have not heard it is its own kind of edit, and it happens here in the weeks directly before release rather than after it. Songs written for a specific hour of the night get tested in rooms the writer will only ever see once, which is a problem this desk has looked at before.

I think I spoke too soon is released on 16 October via Parlophone and Atlas Artists. Until then, the only evidence of what Rachel Chinouriri’s second album actually sounds like is one single, a set of credits and three cities that do not obviously belong on the same page.

This article was AI-assisted and edited for accuracy.

By Will Lisil / August 27, 2026

Afro Music Blues Caribbean Cinematic Classical Country Electronic Folk Hip-Hop Holiday Music Jazz Music Technology & Innovation Pop Queer Music & LGBTQA+ R&B Rock

Stem Separation Changed What a Remix Is

Pulling a clean vocal out of a finished mix used to be impossible. Now it takes seconds, and the consequences are still being worked out.

For most of recorded history, a finished mix was final. The individual parts were welded together and could not be recovered. Machine-learning separation has undone that, and the implications reach a long way past remixing.

You can listen to our full playlist which contains the artist’s music, and know more about the artist’s work by scrolling down the page.

PLAYLIST

Extraction Became Trivial

Pulling a clean vocal out of a finished stereo mix was effectively impossible for most of recorded history, and it now takes a few seconds on a laptop.

Machine-learning separation models, trained on very large quantities of music with known component parts, can distinguish vocals, drums, bass and other instruments within a mixed recording and output them separately.

The quality is good enough for practical use. Artefacts are audible under scrutiny, particularly on dense material, and for remixing, sampling and live performance the results are entirely usable.

It Changed Who Can Remix

The immediate consequence is that access to official stems stopped being a prerequisite for remixing.

Historically a remixer needed the rights holder to supply the multitrack, which meant remixing was something arranged through labels and granted to established producers. That gatekeeping is gone.

Anyone can now extract a vocal from any recording and build something around it, which has produced an enormous volume of unofficial remixes and a corresponding rights problem that nobody has resolved cleanly.

Separation quality also varies sharply by source material. Sparse recordings separate cleanly; dense, heavily compressed mixes produce audible artefacts, and material where instruments share a frequency range confuses the models most.

The Legal Position Is Unchanged

It is worth being clear that the technology has not altered the law, only the practical difficulty of infringing it.

An extracted vocal is a derivative of a copyrighted master. Using it without permission is infringement in the same way sampling without clearance is, regardless of how the extraction was performed.

What has changed is enforcement reality. Platforms detect and act on some of this automatically, a great deal circulates without challenge, and rights holders have generally chosen to tolerate promotional uses while pursuing commercial ones.

Archival and Restoration Benefits Are Real

The most straightforwardly positive application is on material where the multitracks no longer exist, which is a large proportion of recorded history.

Separation permits genuine remixing of recordings that survive only as a stereo master, allowing balance corrections, noise reduction targeted at one element, and surround or spatial versions that were previously impossible.

Several high-profile catalogue projects have used exactly this, and the results have been accepted by audiences who would have rejected a conventional remaster of the same material.

Archival applications have an ethical dimension too. Remixing a recording whose artists are dead means making balance decisions they never approved, which is a real objection even where the technical result is superior.

DJs and Live Performers Use It Constantly

A quieter but larger use is in performance, where separation has become routine rather than exceptional.

Removing a vocal to create an instrumental for mixing, isolating a drum part to layer under another track, or extracting an acapella for a live mashup are now standard practice, executed in real time by software built into performance systems.

That has changed what a DJ set can contain, since any recording is now effectively available in component form regardless of what the label released.

The Unresolved Question Is Consent

What remains genuinely unsettled is whether artists have any say in their work being decomposed this way, and currently they largely do not.

A vocal performance can be lifted from its arrangement and placed in a context the singer would have refused, and the technical barrier that previously made this difficult has gone. Existing law addresses reproduction rather than this kind of recontextualising.

Some rights holders have begun releasing official stems to get ahead of it, on the reasoning that supplying the material lets them set terms. That is probably the direction of travel, since the alternative is attempting to prohibit something that anyone can already do.

Official stem releases are probably where this settles. Supplying the parts lets a rights holder set terms and formats rather than trying to prohibit something any listener can now do in seconds.

Mk.gee performing live with a Fender guitar

Mk.gee Made a 33-Minute Debut With No Guests and No Clear Vocals

Will Lisil

August 28, 2026

Almost every instinct in modern record-making pushes the vocal forward. Streaming rewards an identifiable hook early, playlists reward clarity, and…

Michael Kiwanuka performing live with a Fender guitar under purple stage lighting

Michael Kiwanuka Made Small Changes by Not Trying to Prove Anything

Will Lisil

August 28, 2026

There is a particular problem that arrives after an album wins something. The next record has to answer it, and…

Kae Tempest Sampled His Own Old Lyrics to Argue With Them

Nala Sinephro photographed seated on a staircase

Nala Sinephro Scored an A24 Fight Film Without Once Sounding Like One

Nilüfer Yanya performing live with her band under stage lighting

Every Nilüfer Yanya Record Runs Through the Same Second Person

Fidelity album artwork, a high-contrast halftone portrait of Yaya Bey

Yaya Bey Built Fidelity Around Three Deaths and One Miami Hotel Room

Arlo Parks performing live under stage lighting on the Ambiguous Desire era

Ambiguous Desire Rebuilds Arlo Parks Around a New York Dancefloor

Rachel Chinouriri’s Second Album Is One Night Out, Five Years Long

Why Folk Keeps Recording the Same Songs

Jazz and the Long Take

What Release Day Means When Nothing Is Released

The Click Track Problem in Orchestral Recording

The Return of the Arrangement in R&B

How a Pop Vocal Actually Gets Built

By Esther Winslow / August 25, 2026

Afro Music Blues Caribbean Cinematic Classical Country Electronic Folk Hip-Hop Holiday Music Jazz Music Discussion & Analysis Pop Queer Music & LGBTQA+ R&B Rock

The Return of the Arrangement in R&B

After years of sparse, loop-led production, a lot of R&B is being written with parts again.

For most of the last decade the dominant R&B production style was subtraction: a loop, a sparse drum pattern, a great deal of space. A noticeable amount of current R&B is doing the opposite, and writing arrangements again.

You can listen to our full playlist which contains the artist’s music, and know more about the artist’s work by scrolling down the page.

PLAYLIST

Parts Are Returning

After an extended period in which R&B production was dominated by sparse, loop-led arrangements, a significant amount of the genre is being written with distinct instrumental parts again.

The loop-led approach had real advantages: it was fast, it left enormous space for a vocal, and it suited a production process built around producers sending beats rather than bands working in rooms.

What is appearing now is closer to arrangement in the older sense — bass lines that move independently, chord voicings that change across a section, horn and string writing, and drum parts that develop rather than repeat.

Live Musicians Came Back First

The shift is traceable partly to a return of played instruments, particularly bass and keys, on records that would previously have used programmed parts.

A played bass line does not repeat identically, and it responds to the harmony rather than sitting under it. That single change forces the rest of the arrangement to accommodate movement it previously did not have.

Once one part moves, others tend to follow, because a static pad underneath a moving bass sounds increasingly like an omission rather than a choice.

Arranger credits have returned alongside the parts, which is a meaningful change in how these records are made. A named arranger implies written charts and a session rather than a producer assembling parts alone.

Harmonic Vocabulary Widened Again

Alongside that, the harmonic language has become more elaborate, drawing again on the extended chords and voice-leading that connected earlier R&B to jazz.

Loop-led production tends toward a repeating two- or four-bar harmonic cell, which constrains how much a progression can develop. Writing with parts permits longer harmonic structures with genuine movement and resolution.

That in turn changes what vocalists can do. A melody written over a developing progression can go somewhere that a melody over a repeating cell cannot, and vocal arrangements have become correspondingly more ambitious.

The Vocal Stopped Carrying Everything

In the sparse era, the vocal carried nearly all the musical information, with the production functioning as a frame around it.

That produced some exceptional vocal performances and placed considerable weight on a single element. When the arrangement contributes, the vocal can do less and still be effective, which opens up restraint as an option.

Records in this mode tend to use the voice as one part among several rather than as the entire foreground, which is closer to how the genre worked historically.

Recording a live rhythm section also changes the vocal approach. Singing against players who respond invites a different, more conversational performance than singing to a fixed loop, and the vocals on these records are audibly less gridded.

It Costs More and Takes Longer

The reason the sparse approach dominated was not only aesthetic. It was substantially cheaper and faster, and the return to arrangement reverses both.

Written parts require players, sessions, someone to write them, and time to record and mix a larger number of elements. A record with strings and horns is a materially different budget from one built on a loop and a vocal.

That means the shift is uneven, appearing first among artists with resources and among independents who prioritise it, rather than as a wholesale change across the genre.

A Correction Rather Than a Rejection

The most accurate description is a correction rather than a repudiation of what came before.

The sparse, loop-led style produced a substantial body of good records and remains entirely viable. What changed is that it stopped being the only available register, so its use became a choice again rather than a default.

That is generally how these cycles resolve. A dominant approach becomes the baseline, an alternative develops in response, and the genre ends up with both available — which is a better position than it occupied at either extreme.

The shift is uneven by budget rather than by taste, which is worth stating. Written arrangements and hired players cost money, so the correction is visible first among established artists and well-funded independents.